SPECIAL ASPECTS OF SPERM WHALES AND THEIR RELEVANCE TO WHALE WATCHING

7.2 Guidelines For Boats And Equipment For Use In Whale-Watch Operations

Box 5. Recommended Guidelines For Sperm Whale-Watch Operators In Boats

Distance to whales Recommendations to whale-watch boat operators Special Considerations
At all times when in vicinity of whales
  • Designate dedicated staff person as whale lookout (in addition to skipper).
  • Maintain boat speed of no more than 6 knots.
  • Do not switch off engine.
  • Do not approach under sail without engine running.
  • Co-ordinate multiple-boat approaches from same direction so that whales can swim away.
  • Do not allow tourists to enter water or attempt to swim with whales.
Socialising groups:
Do not exceed 30min in proximity to whales.
At 400-100m to nearest whale
    Exercise cautionary behaviour listed above, plus:
  • Minimise boat noise.
  • Make no sudden changes in speed or direction.
  • Do not reverse direction (except in emergency).
  • Maintain boat speed of no more than 2 knots faster than whalesÂ’ travel speed.
  • Move toward whales from behind.
  • If whales approach, stop vessel in neutral.
  • If whales show signs of disturbance (Box 2), stop vessel and/or move slowly away.
At 100-50m to nearest whale
    Exercise cautionary behaviour listed above, plus:
  • Position boat within a 60" sector behind whale.
  • Maintain boat speed that does not exceed whales' travel speed.
  • Never approach closer than 50m.
Socialising groups:
Do not approach closer than 100m.
Female groups:
Never approach solitary calves.
Departure to >400 m from dive location
  • If idling, wait 5min after whale(s)' dive before engaging gear.
  • If already moving, continue cautiously at the same speed.
  • Follow instructions for 400m distance until >400m from where dive occurred.

Listening to whales can be a very rewarding part of a whale-watching experience.

7.3 Recommended Guidelines For Aircraft In Sperm Whale-Watch Operations

Aircraft are particularly likely to affect whales if they fly directly over them (because more sound then enters the sea) and/or the aircraft's shadow passes close to the whales.

7.4 Recommended Guidelines For Special Permits For Close and/or In-Water Approaches Of Film-Makers To Sperm Whales

While film-makers are likely to cause more disturbance to whales this can potentially be balanced by the greater benefits; good films are seen by very large audiences so that the disturbance of a few animals could carry a positive message to millions of viewers. Also films are attractive as a means of promoting a country, including its whale-watching industry. Filmmakers might also contribute direct revenue through a license fee.

It was noted that as more films were made about whales, film-makers were seeking ever more difficult and impressive images, involving closer approaches to animals in a variety of situations. For example, the group was told that in Japan, where there are no regulations to control whale-watching, a great many would-be film-makers are pressuring the operators to make repeated close approaches to whales.

It was agreed that these recommendations from the workshop should cover ail areas, whether or not they have in place regulations to control whale watching.

7.5 Guidelines To Establish Carrying Capacity Of Sperm Whale-Watching Operations In A Given Area

Having adopted and enforced appropriate codes of conduct for whale watchers, managers have next to decide what level of whale watching, within this framework, is acceptable. In effect, what is the biological carrying capacity for whale watching in the area being considered. (it was noted that the situation in Dominica was unusual and fortunate, in that some baseline research had been carried out before the establishment of whale- watch operations, whereas in most other areas it was likely that research would only begin after whale watching had started.)

It was recognised that many different impacts should be taken into account, including disturbance which the whale might be exposed to in different regions at other times of the year or at different times in the animal's life cycle.

The difficulty of conducting and funding research needed to address this question was widely acknowledged by the participants. It was felt by some that one productive approach might be to investigate how data which could easily be collected from whale-watching operations, in some cases by the operators themselves, could indicate whether whale watching was being conducted at an appropriate level. For example, it would be a simple matter to log a whalewatching boat's behaviour with a simple computer/GPS system and to record when boats were with whales and how many other vessels were also present. Marked changes in the behaviour of whale-watching boats, such as having to go further to find whales, or to find whales without other boats present, could be indicators that whale watching effort was becoming too high. Clearly work needs to be done to investigate how best to collect and interpret such data and this should be a priority.

It was agreed that in the likely initial absence of the required information, recommendations should be kept very simple and non-specific, and that the initial level of activity should be set conservatively, especially for social groups. A possible interim guideline was suggested:

Any individual sperm whale should not have commercial whale- watch vessels within 400 metres for more than 25% of its surface time during daylight hours.

Discussion then focused on how feasible it would be to implement research programmes that could effectively identify individual whales (to assess whether or not the above objective was being met), and to estimate the local population abundance.

It was agreed that in the absence of detailed information on the effects of boat activity on sperm whales in the area in question, it would often be appropriate to take the following steps:


Previous Page
Back to the Whale-Watching-Web

Rauno Lauhakangas